Technically, Ms. Ann Coulter being an original conservative, she’s logically correct in her arguments saying that she wants to elect a true evolutionary American nationalist, might be a Protestant with 200+ years of legacy, & not an Indian, in this case Vivek, in the elections. And indeed, she’s verily following the principles of what defines true conservatism. And had the Liberals followed the true principles of liberalism alike her around World, then things would’ve been different for globalization as well, and I wouldn’t have been writing this blog today. And ethically & logically, I’ve also agreed with the contentions given by the original Japanese, Indian, Chinese, Russian, South Korean, Zionists ‘conservatives’ as well (despite me being a proponent of one world one law one government one currency order). As, Japan lost its aesthetics post WW2, India lost that in 800 years of invasion-proselytism & loot, Zionists are still fighting for their promised land even after thousands of years, Russians too saw fall of tsars, Chinese witnessed colonial rule & poverty that led to rise in communism, & so goes for South Koreans as well; and many more.
But herein a caveat is involved in being conservative in the modern World. And I’m covering the same way I’ve covered modern liberal-leftists. When you’re more inclined towards being conservative, then the idea of global rule or dominance by that specific territory is implicitly struck-off from the wish-list at least. Take herein some examples: